Why separating parents need to act fast on orders preventing removal

by Sol Dolor08 Aug 2018

The breakdown of relationships can be messy, but things get more complicated when there are children involved. Angela Li, a solicitor at K3 Legal, says that it is quite common for one parent to attempt to take a child overseas without the knowledge or consent of the other parent when relationships end.

This is especially true when parents have immigrated to New Zealand and one parent wishes to return to their home country after the relationship disintegrates. This is why Li reminds that acting with urgency is paramount in these situations.

“There is essentially nothing to physically stop a child being removed from New Zealand without consent, therefore it is very important that as a parent you act fast if you have concerns that this might be a risk,” she says.

“A child, especially an infant or a toddler, would have no say when he or she is removed by a parent to another country. Once a child is already removed from New Zealand, the process of having that child returned to New Zealand can be particularly difficult and costly and will also depend on which country they are in,” she says.

New Zealand is a signatory to the Hague Abduction Convention, an international treaty that provides a mechanism to return a child abducted by a parent from one signatory country to another. However, the return process is not easy and, in some cases, near impossible, such as when a child is taken to a non-signatory country.

Li says that parents who have concerns about their children being removed from the country without consent should follow three steps as soon as possible.

Firstly, as a practical measure, they should try to retain their child’s passport. Having the child’s passport in their possession will help reduce the ability of the other parent taking the child away, unless they apply for a new one.

Whether or not the passport is in the suspecting parent’s possession, they may apply for an order from the Family Court to prevent removal of the child from New Zealand, which is the second step. If the order is granted, a border alert needs to be issued through Interpol so that they will be alerted if a child is boarding any aircraft or ship and may be stopped.

An Order Preventing Removal of Child from New Zealand (OPR) can be understood as a warrant issued by the Family Court to prevent the unauthorised removal of a child from New Zealand, with the intent to defeat another person’s claim or right to custody, or access to the child. Hence, to apply for an OPR, there has to be an application for a Parenting Order or an indication that one will be made, as required by section 77 of Care of Children Act 2004, she says.

“If you genuinely fear that your child will be taken out of New Zealand without your consent, to defeat potential parenting orders from the court, you should apply for an order preventing removal,” she says. “You need to keep in mind that having possession of your child’s passport alone is not secure. In New Zealand, only the consent of one parent is required for a child’s New Zealand passport application, so it is possible that the other parent may apply for a new passport for the child and still leave the country without your knowledge. Therefore, obtaining an OPR from the court is the safest option.”

An OPR may be applied for on notice or without notice, she adds.

Where an OPR application is made on notice, a copy of the application will be given to the respondent, who is the person who may take the child out of New Zealand. An on notice application allows the person to tell the court why they think the order should not be made. However, this also gives the other person the opportunity to remove the child from New Zealand after the application is made but before any order is made.

This is why it is more common that OPR applications are made without notice. This is where an application is made to the court without notifying the other party first, so the court can make a decision based on the paper documents and evidence filed by the applying party first.

Such applications are common in urgent situations, she says. Clients can ask lawyers to make an application without notice and the lawyer will assess whether the circumstances justify a without notice application and certify the application.

An OPR application made without notice will be granted when the Family Court is satisfied that a delay would be caused by making the application on notice or might entail serious injury or undue hardship, or risk to the personal safety of the applicant or any child of the applicant’s family, or both. Considering the urgent nature of these applications, decisions for such applications tend to come out on the day, or by the following day.

In addition to obtaining an OPR, concerned parents may also seek for any passport of a child or children to be surrendered to a thirty party, such as the lawyer for the child. They can also ask the court to order that no further New Zealand passports to be issued in the child’s name. If the child is entitled to a foreign passport, the relevant embassy should be notified of the situation.

If there is a genuine concern of a flight risk, steps should be taken immediately. Legal advice is taken from the outset to ensure the correct documents are filed to avoid unnecessary delay, she says.

Angela Li, K3 Legal

 

Related stories:
Five questions lawyers and clients must answer when considering freezing orders
K3 Legal promotes three to senior roles

 

COMMENTS

  • by Stuart Cummings 8/08/2018 10:38:18 a.m.

    The practitioner should also be aware that the quickest and most effective step is to notify Interpol (care off Wellington Police) of the risk of flight and on counsels undertaking to fail for an OPR Interpol will place a notification at passport control that will prevent the child leaving the jurisdiction. This can be achieved within hours.
    Stuart Cummings