Equal parental responsibility is not 50:50 sharing
By Craig Sisterson
A MAJOR Australian review of the practices, procedures, and laws that apply in the Australian federal family law courts has recommended that some provisions enacted as part of controversial 2006 family law reforms be amended or reconsidered in order to clarify areas of confusion, enable better identification of cases where there is a risk of violence, and bring the focus back to what is best for the children.
Australian Attorney-General Robert McClelland released Family Courts Violence Review, a 275-page report written by Professor Richard Chisholm, on 28 January. On the same day, he also released two other major reports (from the Australian Institute of Family Studies and the Family Law Council) examining the family law system and how the family law courts deal with cases involving family violence.
In the Family Courts Violence Review, Chisholm, a retired Family Court judge, noted there were few more difficult or important challenges for the family law system than dealing with cases where family violence was an issue. 